Skip links
Assault Victim Misled by Hospital Receptionist Wins Compensation Fight

Assault Victim Misled by Hospital Receptionist Wins Compensation Fight

Providing misleading information can be just as effective in causing injury as physical acts of negligence. The Supreme Court made that point in guaranteeing substantial compensation to an assault victim who was wrongly informed by an accident and emergency (A&E) department receptionist that he would

Government Updates Guidance on Sleeping Time and the National Minimum Wage

Government Updates Guidance on Sleeping Time and the National Minimum Wage

In a guideline ruling, the Court of Appeal recently found that two care workers were not entitled to be paid the National Minimum Wage (NMW) for time when they were asleep during sleep-in shifts. Noting that conflicting authorities had given rise to a need for

High Court Lifts Suspension on £2.5 Billion Underground Trains Contract

High Court Lifts Suspension on £2.5 Billion Underground Trains Contract

When the outcomes of public contract tendering exercises are challenged, the award of contracts is automatically suspended in order to hold the ring. As a High Court case concerning a multi-billion-pound railway contract showed, deciding whether such suspensions should be lifted involves a delicate balancing

Keen to Cut Inheritance Tax Liabilities? Contact Us Today

Keen to Cut Inheritance Tax Liabilities? Contact Us Today

Giving away assets to your loved ones with warm hands, when you are still fit and healthy, is a readily available means of reducing Inheritance Tax (IHT) liabilities. However, as a guideline Court of Appeal decision illustrated, such gifts must be made without reservation in

Telecommunications Equipment Forced on Reluctant Property Owner

Telecommunications Equipment Forced on Reluctant Property Owner

The new and highly controversial Electronic Communications Code – which enables telecommunications equipment to be effectively forced on reluctant landowners – has come under analysis for what is believed to be the first time in a tribunal case. Two mobile phone operators argued that they